Dr.Omaima Hameed Aladilee (1)
General Background: Transparency has become a central principle in modern information institutions, particularly university libraries that aim to provide equitable access to knowledge and digital resources. Specific Background: In the context of digital transformation, libraries are increasingly expected to implement transparent policies and procedures to ensure that users can access information services fairly and efficiently. Knowledge Gap: Despite growing attention to transparency and digital inclusion in library science, limited empirical studies have examined how transparency practices relate to digital justice within university library environments. Aims: This study investigates the relationship between transparency practices and the achievement of digital justice in the Central Library of the University of Karbala. Results: Using a survey method with 183 beneficiaries and statistical analysis including structural equation modeling, the findings demonstrate a significant relationship between transparency practices and digital justice, with transparency explaining approximately 45% of the variance in digital justice outcomes. Dimensions such as information accessibility, accountability, and community participation show notable associations with equitable digital service provision. Novelty: The study integrates the concepts of organizational transparency and digital justice within a single empirical framework in the context of an academic library. Implications: The findings provide evidence that transparent governance, accessible information channels, and participatory practices can support equitable digital access and improve users’ experiences with library services in higher education institutions.
Highlights:
Keywords: Transparency Practices, Digital Justice, Academic Libraries, Information Accessibility, Digital Inclusion
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, “IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and Other Information Workers,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11092
American Library Association, “Digital Equity in Libraries,” ALA Policy Brief, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/broadband/digitalequity
H. Alansari, “Transparency Practices in Academic Library Management: A Case Study in Kuwait,” Library Management, vol. 39, no. 4–5, pp. 278–291, 2018, doi: 10.1108/LM-12-2016-0099.
A. Foster and D. McMenemy, “Transparency and Openness in Public Library Service Delivery,” Public Library Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 226–242, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01616846.2019.1581870.
S. Kim and H. Lee, “Enhancing Transparency in Digital Library Services: A User-Centered Approach,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no. 5, p. 102403, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403.
P. T. Jaeger and J. C. Bertot, “Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating User-Centered and Equitable Digital Library Services,” The Library Quarterly, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83–108, 2011, doi: 10.1086/657444.
Y. Zhang and S. Kudva, “E-Quality and Digital Inclusion: Policy and Practice in Public Libraries,” Library Trends, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 237–253, 2014, doi: 10.1353/lib.2014.0016.
A. N. Gibson, S. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and C. McClure, “Libraries on the Frontlines: Neutrality and Social Justice,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 751–766, 2017, doi: 10.1108/EDI-11-2016-0100.
S. Corrall, “Transparency and Openness in Academic Libraries: Ethics and Implications,” Library Trends, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 386–405, 2019, doi: 10.1353/lib.2019.0003.
H. Zhou and S. Pi, “Organizational Transparency and Employee Engagement in Academic Libraries,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 102299, 2021.
A. Smith, K. Thompson, and M. Lee, “Digital Equity in Libraries: Leveraging Technology to Bridge the Divide,” Library Management, vol. 42, no. 4–5, pp. 313–327, 2021, doi: 10.1108/LM-09-2020-0138.
S. J. Piotrowski and G. G. Van Ryzin, “Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government,” The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0275074019877911.
G. E. Evans and P. L. Ward, Leadership in Academic Libraries Today: Connecting Users, Institutions, and Communities. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
A. S. Sife and E. T. Lwoga, “Digital Transparency in Academic Libraries: Current Practices and Emerging Trends,” Information Development, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 467–478, 2022, doi: 10.1177/02666669211016777.
OECD, Open Government: The Global Context and the Way Forward. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2017, doi: 10.1787/9789264268104-en.
Transparency International, Transparency in Public Administration. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International, 2014.
UNESCO, “Towards Access to Information for All by 2030,” UNESCO Publishing, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373722
UNESCO, “Access to Information: A Key to Building Knowledge Societies,” UNESCO Publishing, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371489
N. Evans and M. Schneider, “Organizational Transparency and Library Policies: Increasing Patron Engagement,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 573–579, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.004.
S. G. Grimmelikhuijsen, G. Porumbescu, B. Hong, and T. Im, “Transparency and Trust in Government: A Cross-National Comparative Experiment,” Public Administration Review, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 575–586, 2013, doi: 10.1111/puar.12047.
L. Robinson, H. Cotten, J. Ono, A. Quan-Haase, G. Mesch, W. Chen, and J. Schulz, “Digital Inequalities and Why They Matter,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 569–582, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.
L. Robinson, “Digital Inequalities 2.0: New Challenges and Opportunities,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 940–957, 2022, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962949.
K. M. Hoffman, N. Wallace, and J. Davis, “Advancing Digital Equity in Academic Libraries: Strategies for Inclusion and Access,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 567–586, 2022, doi: 10.5860/crl.83.4.567.
UNESCO, Accountability in Education: Meeting Our Commitments. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375706
UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report: Technology in Education – A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384438
OECD, Digital Economy Outlook 2020: Shaping Policies for Digital Transformation. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2021, doi: 10.1787/69096873-en.
European Commission, “2030 Digital Compass: The European Way for the Digital Decade,” Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/060204
L. Czerniewicz et al., “A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education,” Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 946–967, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4.
E. Van Laar, A. J. Van Deursen, J. A. Van Dijk, and J. De Haan, “Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 103, pp. 109–123, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106139.
Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development, “The State of Broadband 2021: People-Centred Approaches for Universal Broadband,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://broadbandcommission.org/publication/state-of-broadband-2021/
A. P. Bishop and N. A. Van House, “Digital Services and Community Support in Libraries: Understanding the Human Infrastructure,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 659–672, 2020, doi: 10.1002/asi.24309.
J. F. Hair Jr., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. London, UK: Pearson Education, 2010.